What if Darwin was Wrong?

What if Darwin was Wrong?

We are in the 21st century, at the very cutting edge and peak of mans technological achievement so far. Never before in the history of our species has man had such wonders at his fingertips as those we have created for ourselves in the brief moment in time that is the 150 odd years since the industrial revolution of the 1800’s – apparently.

All scientific investigation into our past up to this point has been designed to fit within this orderly paradigm. But due to these restrictions, and even with all of the significant advances in technology we may have made in the past 150 years, we have made very little progress in solving the puzzles presented to us by the earths past.

The reality is that our distant history is still an enormous riddle. We only know what we do from the gradual piecing together of the many enigmatic and confusing traces that have so far been recovered from around the world, but our true knowledge of ancient history still remains confusing, unknown, or fragmented at best.

All we really have are various creation myths and theories. And it must be clearly understood here that in the case of archeology and even evolution, theories are really no more than ideas and possibilities; one person putting forth what they see as a rational scenario based on the various information or artifacts they have personally been able gather and study. A hypothesis or possibility based on available evidence. These theories are then put forth to the Academic community for peer review and when the evidence that led to the conclusions has been tested and assessed and criticized and re-assessed and re-criticized and the idea has been deemed agreeable by all parties, an overall assumption of fact is born. This “fact” can then be used as a basis, or ‘rule of thumb,’ for further studies; that is, until someone else comes along and disproves it by discovering and proving a new ‘fact’. That is how peer review works.

For example: the theory encompassing the entire history of mans ascension that was just described for you on the second page was surmised from scientists studying a total collection of a mere 200 hundred bone fragments, which was the entire amount that had been excavated and recovered from around the world at the time. And the theory has never really been subject to any serious revision or academic challenge.

The entire theory is also based on the assumption that Darwin was correct...

But what if the basic supposition that was used as the ‘rule of thumb’ in many of these cases was erroneous to begin with? What if it didn’t happen that way at all? What if our history did not actually run as has so far been believed?

Surely if it could in any way, shown to be possible that mans history and indeed the entire Earths history ran in a completely different way to what has been currently theorized, and taught as fact, then shouldn’t that be investigated too? Shouldn’t all avenues be exhausted before being dismissed, until the whole and real truth is found? Isn’t that true investigative science?

Well, yes it is, but the trouble unfortunately, is that modern science contains a certain amount of Politics and well, people just simply hate having their theories proved wrong. In fact it’s always been that way. As history recalls to us, the great scientist Copernicus wasn’t even game to release his theory on planetary rotation until he was on his death bed and it was his very last day
of life; and just look at what happened to Galileo. Even Newton, as admired and respected as he was, never announced his involvement in Alchemy and his search for the hidden codes of creation he believed were locked within the words of the Bible until death, for fear of being tried for heresy. In that respect, it appears that things haven’t really changed a great deal.

If the truth be known, and in stark contrast to the currently accepted view of history we are presented with by Academia, there are certain, and quite numerous, telltale signs on our planet and in our solar system at large that suggest a very different course of events than the orthodox tenet, and there are also other more esoteric signs that can be found around the world, evidence that has been left by our ancestors clearly suggesting that they possessed a very extensive and extraordinarily detailed knowledge of these events and of the behavior and workings of our planet and solar system. There is also evidence that they based entire cultures on these celestial events and believed them to be moments of incredible significance for mankind and for the earth. And there are also tantalizing hints of a long forgotten method to decipher these earthly and celestial signs, if we could but find a way to read and understand them.

I understand of course that most people who disagree with the theories of Charles Darwin are almost automatically labeled as ‘creationists’ but I assure you that this is by no means the case. In all reality, after even a cursory investigation, biblical creation stories are far too contradictory to make any real sense. Also, in the case of the biblical tale, the really disturbing part is that the story is not actually original to the bible as has been claimed but is in fact, as has now been adequately proven, a borrowed, greatly edited version of a much earlier, more complete account.

By way of comparison, the orthodox accounts and theories of evolution and mans past history that we have been given by Academia, (and that are now presented to us, virtually as concrete facts,) are also patchy and problematic at best, while some can even appear quite fanciful. The real problem with both theories being, that they simply cannot account for a great many details and, in many cases, are both vastly contrary to quite solid evidence.

But cunningly, when such evidence is found, if it appears to, in some way, prove our history to be different to what is taught; it is hurriedly dismissed, ignored, hidden, thrown into a dark basement locker or somehow, mysteriously ‘lost.’ In the past many such acts of intellectual vandalism were often committed in the name of various religions in an effort to maintain supremacy. Such things are probably to be expected by religious organizations as most are essentially insecure in their foundations and need constant reinforcement, but when we find these deeds also being committed within the scientific community it becomes far more sinister and disturbing. In an institution of learning such an attitude can only be described as detrimental to the true pursuit of knowledge and extraordinarily unscientific – at best.

And have you ever noticed how many Scholars that do actually come forth with a different theory about our past, and seriously attempt to discover and debate the real truths, often have their efforts constantly thwarted and are invariably ridiculed and ostracized? And not just by Academia either, many are quite often terribly vilified through legal, social, and media channels as well. It seems incredulous how much trouble and effort is actually gone to in order to stifle their information and perpetuate what appears to be, an enormous myth that is being currently presented to us as historical fact.

The real truth of the matter is that almost every continent on earth can lay claim to some strange or unusual relic from the past that cannot easily be explained by either Academics or Theologians. Many scholars have attempted to explain away or quietly dismiss such enigmas off handedly but there are simply too many that have been found and even more that continue to be unearthed that just cannot be explained away. Where then, did all these things come from?

Do we need to know? Are they all nothing more than a collection of interesting and unexplained “oddities” from a past that is largely unimportant to our future lives, or is there actually something of benefit, or even great importance, that we can learn from them?

Was there a real reason for the people of old to have gone to such a ridiculous amount of effort to create the many intricately detailed works of such amazing precision that have been recovered, or to build such incredible structures? Could there be some message contained within the structures of these Ancient Places that we may be missing? If these ancient structures were really designed purely as Temples then it certainly seems that these people went to an awful lot of trouble to build them and to make sure we would notice their work. Or could it be that many of them were perhaps something other than merely temples or fortresses?

No comments:

Post a Comment

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...